you're reading...
Religion, Theist Wackiness

14 Deadly Sins

Not that I spend much time keeping up with the Vatican’s Litany of Lunacy, but I’m sorry I missed this when it hit the news last February.  The Unchanging and Forever Perfect Word of God™ has been altered slightly to include new sins that God had apparently not thought of when he wrote the Bible.  These are:

  • Genetic Modification
  • Human Experimentation
  • Polluting the Environment
  • Social Injustice
  • Causing Poverty
  • Financial Gluttony
  • Taking or Selling Drugs

I’m sure there are some specifics laid out somewhere in the Holy Writ of Vatican Law™ but I don’t have them in front of me at the moment.  I’ll just wing it.

If the Vatican believes genetic modification is sinful, then they better get ready for some serious “causing of poverty.”  Damn near every piece of food at the grocery store has been genetically modified.  It would be extremely difficult to go anywhere in the first world and find food that hasn’t been.

Perhaps they mean genetic modification like in the movies.  They don’t want us creating Ubermen or giant fish that eat Manhattan.  Not to worry.  Those are movies.  It doesn’t work like that.

More likely, they don’t like the idea of us futzing around with the human soul residing in each and every little egg in every womb on the planet, and don’t want to be too blatant about it.  But that makes me wonder about something.  Is there half a soul in each egg, and half a soul in each sperm?  Or does the human soul reside in eggs until the soulless sperm gets there?  Or, does the soul spring magically into existence at fertilization?

These are important questions.

Likewise, what kind of human experimentation are we talking about?  Does the Vatican mean that we shouldn’t do things like the Tuskegee Experiments?  I agree.  But what was wrong about those experiments wasn’t the human experimentation itself, but the way the experiment was carried out.  Those poor subjects were not treated, even after penicillin was discovered.  The disease was allowed to run its course, and they never even knew they could be cured.  That’s called lying, and it’s already a sin.  (Read Proverbs.  The lord hates a lying tongue.)

But human experimentation is how a lot of good things happen.  We have ethics regulations now (largely inspired by the Tuskegee debacle) that prevent scientists from doing cruel things to humans or lying to them about the risks, or their diagnoses.  Experimentation is how science works.  It’s how we verify our hypotheses.  Is the Vatican really telling us that studying humans is off limits?

It’s nice that God is officially against polluting the environment.  I suppose we can expect the closing of all those religious trinket shops all over the world.  All that plastic — just to make little figurines of angels.  And all those Jesus icons that will survive the rapture by three or four thousand years.  What a waste, when all good Christians feel Jesus in their hearts anyway!

And I suppose the Vatican will have to look closely at Vatican City and convert to solar power.  That would be nice.  And what about all those cavernous churches all over the world?  Those things take a LOT of energy to heat and cool.  Will we see a massive down-sizing by the church?  Will church meetings be held outside in clement weather, and will the sheep be expected to wear their wool to keep warm in the winter?  After all, polluting is a deadly sin.

What about Social Injustice?  Let’s start with an easy one.  Churches in America are one of the most segregated institutions left.  We’re still very comfortable with the idea of “Black Churches,” especially in the south.  You can prove this to yourself.  Just pick a church — any church — this Sunday.  Go in, count the whites and blacks.  Compare that ratio to the population in your city.

Causing Poverty?  Two words:  Mother Teresa.

Financial Gluttony?

And finally, there’s taking drugs.  I suppose we’re talking about illegal drugs.  But there’s a problem.  If I happen to be in Holland, I can do things that are not a sin, but if I move to America, the same action will be a sin.  Isn’t that moral relativism?  OH NO!  NOT MORAL RELATIVISM!!

Or… are there some drugs that are just off limits, regardless of the law of the land?  Which ones are they?  Why are they off limits?  What about prescription drugs?  What about all the uninsured Americans who can’t afford to go to a doctor, but need antibiotics, and order them from Canada or India?  Is alcohol a drug?  Why or why not?  No more wine at communion?

I disagree with the prohibition on drugs.  Too many loopholes, and too much emphasis on politics.  I can’t think of a reason why any particular drug is always bad.

All things considered, I do think many of these new deadly sins are pretty bad, and I commend the church for noticing them as soon as a century after the rest of the world.  That’s ahead of schedule for them.  (It took centuries for them to be OK with the diabolus in musica.) Now, let’s see if they take the beam out of their own eye before nitpicking motes.

Bets, anyone?

add to del.icio.us :: Add to Blinkslist :: add to furl :: Digg it :: add to ma.gnolia :: Stumble It! :: add to simpy :: seed the vine :: :: :: TailRank :: post to facebook

Discussion

6 Responses to “14 Deadly Sins”

  1. Ooohh, that was pretty brutal ownage.

    Posted by butterbattle | January 15, 2010, 4:05 pm
  2. It may be worth pointing out that the original 7 deadly sins and 7 cardinal virtues were also not read directly from the Bible. They originated, unless I am mistaken, with “Paradise Lost”, by Milton. The Catholic Church does not have a strong tradition of crediting the Bible with literal authority, reserving this for itself. Indeed, it was a slapdash approach to the veracity of Bible translations and restriction of Bible access to the clergy that was arguably the most important factor in provoking the Reformation.

    Posted by Elliott Bignell | January 16, 2010, 5:19 am
  3. Thanks, Elliott. Very good point.

    Posted by hambydammit | January 16, 2010, 5:12 pm
  4. It’s all very PC to decry genetically modified foods, but I recently read about genetically modified rice in Asia. Beta carotene has been genetically spliced onto white rice, resulting in a coral colored grain that is significantly more nutritious than regular white rice. It represents an enormous nutritional boost in rural Asian communities. Why should this be inherently wrong? Eugenics? Yes, morally wrong. But genetic modification? Why?

    Posted by Susan Walsh | January 20, 2010, 12:33 am
  5. Susan: I don’t have anything against GE foods themselves, though there are some very real problems just coming to light with the use of some crops with built-in herbicides (…there’s also the issue of Monsanto’s behavior, but that’s separate from the actual science itself): namely, we’ve created ‘super pests’, for lack of a better term, in some regions of the world because the weeds have, after a few generations, adapted to the herbicides.

    As a result, a very wide variety of GE crops do not actually produce larger yields than ordinary crops – and the latter are much cheaper to produce (BT corn remains a strong exception; there is no good reason at all to reject corn borer resistant maize, as it’s yield is much stronger and the corn borer simply cannot ‘adapt’ to the toxins in the BT corn husks).

    Posted by Kevin R Brown | February 6, 2010, 8:08 pm
  6. …Oh, and Hamby: I, of course, am anything but an ally of the Vatican – but I wouldn’t begrudge the current administration in Vatican City for the extremely old palace architecture they reside in. That’s sort of like calling out President Obama for living in the White House; what was done to construct these buildings cannot be undone.

    Vatican City is, to my knowledge, pretty darn environmentally friendly. I believe it’s electricity is supplied by tidal generators (like a lot of Italy’s power), there are no airports in Vatican City, there is a robust public transit system, etc. Even the damn Pope mobile is a Mercedes-Benz ML450 Hybrid.

    Nitpicky, but just saying.

    You’d think God would be more opposed to doing things butchering Tutsis, signing Concordats with the Nazis or lying to Africans so they get HIV infection when having unprotected sex than to not having a recycling program.

    Oh well.

    Posted by Kevin R Brown | February 6, 2010, 8:25 pm

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 85 other followers